Baksheesh

The Arabist has been run by freelance journalists since 2003 as a labor of love. We don't make much from ads, so please contribute to keep this site going.

Search
Subscribe

Get Arabist via email: 


Your Middle East is a digital newspaper about the Middle East for the web, iPad and iPhone.


Get Arabist contributor Ashraf Khalil's new book!

Social

The Arabist Podcast
Sponsored Links

UK City Guides        Enquira Local


For low prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets shop ShowTickets.com for your upcoming Las Vegas trip.


Graduation Dresses


The UK Web Directory Can Give You What You Need


Connecting global buyers with China suppliers — 
Made-in-China.com 


Sourcing Quality Products from Qualified Manufacturers — ECVV.com

Partners

 

Powered by Squarespace
« Charts Galore: Round one of Egypt's elections | Main | Figuring out Egypt's elections: Qasr al-Nil »
Friday
Dec022011

Great chart of Morocco's election results

See after the jump — we hope to produce something similar for Egypt's elections. The organization that put this together is CAPDEMA.

Reader Comments (7)

Is there a good summary anywhere of the alignments of these parties? I'm ashamed to say that the only two I've heard of are PJD and Istiqlal.

Dec 2, 2011 at 12:46 PM | Unregistered CommenterJonathan Edelstein

USFP is the major center-left party; PT, MTDS are left-wing (also PSU which boycotted), PPS is ex-Stalinist now completely pro-regime; RNI, PAM, MP, UC are all pro-monarchy "notables" parties that have taken an anti-Islamist line. MP has a strong Middle Atlas Berber component.

Dec 2, 2011 at 12:49 PM | Registered CommenterIssandr El Amrani

So in other words, the PJD would have to include at least some of the pro-regime in order to form a government (they account for 59 percent of seats including Istiqlal). What's Istiqlal's attitude toward cooperation with Islamists? Is the likely outcome a fractured coalition of the PJD, some of the parties on the left, and some of the less anti-Islamist monarchists, creating a weak government which the king can continue to dominate?

Dec 2, 2011 at 12:58 PM | Unregistered CommenterJonathan Edelstein

Istiqlal is conservative and has no big ideological difference with Islamists but has gone from a once great party to a parking space for bright young technocrats that the palace wants in ministerial posts. USFP is in some ways a better match for the PJD in terms of being more anti-establishmentarian but has problem with elderly leadership not moving along. But in any case, the PJD is unlikely to really take on the palace for now, and neither are the leadership of the Istiqlal or USFP. They'll find a way to work together, and right now the new royal advisor in the cabinet must be brokering the deal.

Dec 2, 2011 at 1:16 PM | Registered CommenterIssandr El Amrani

Jonathan, the coalition will be official on saturday, but we already know that the Istiqlal wants to join the PJD. So they are ready for a cooperation with the moderate islamists. Everything will be clearer tomorrow

Dec 2, 2011 at 1:22 PM | Unregistered CommenterSara K

Issandr, thank you for the handy recap on the elections. I wonder if you'll manage to have the time to analyse the Moroccan elections a bit more in detail, as you seem to be - rightfully - focusing fully on Egypt right now. I know the country's politics a bit, and much more than the rest of the Maghreb, and would very much enjoy your thoughts. Some of the articles you have linked in the other day were good as well, but I would appreciate your views as well.

In general, I would also like to congratulate for running this blog. It's a great, reliable window on the region for those of us who are interested but alas do not read Arabic.

Dec 3, 2011 at 12:54 AM | Unregistered Commenterazazello

Here is one of Egypt's election's thus far broken down by islamists vs seculars (still rough and preliminary numbers) but gives a sense on a per governorate basis...

http://pic.twitter.com/AwV6TMtE

Dec 3, 2011 at 1:47 PM | Unregistered CommenterMe
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.