American priorities in Iran... vs. elsewhere

As many of you know, the nasty regime in Iran has repressed a return of the Green Movement on the streets yesterday, and now pro-regime MPs are even calling for opposition figures to be hanged. Meanwhile, protests were also brutally suppressed in Bahrain, Yemen and Algeria — respectively an absolute monarchy, a largely failed state and an incredibly brutal military dictatorship. In Jordan, another absolute monarch with one of the most feared and brutal security services in the region is also facing protests. Yet it's Iran that gets all the attention:

Daily Press Briefings : Daily Press Briefing - Febrary 14, 2011
 

Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:53:55 -0600

MR. CROWLEY: Well, that – what has guided us throughout the last three months and guides us in terms of how we focus on Iran is the core principles – the Secretary mentioned them again today – of restraint from violence, respect for universal rights, and political and social reform. There is a – it is hypocrisy that Iran says one thing in the context of Egypt but refuses to put its own words into action in its own country.

QUESTION: How about other countries – Bahrain, Yemen, or Algeria, or Jordan? Why you are not talking about those countries and you are condemning what is happening in Iran? 

MR. CROWLEY: Well, actually, in the other countries there is greater respect for the rights of the citizens. I mean, we are watching developments in other countries, including Yemen, including Algeria, including Bahrain. And our advice is the same. As the Secretary made clear in her Doha speech, there’s a significant need for political, social, and economic reform across the region, and we encourage governments to respect their citizen’s right to protest peacefully, respect their right to freedom of expression and assembly, and hope that there will be an ongoing engagement, a dialogue between people in governments, and they can work together on the necessary forms.

It's fine for the US to criticize Iran, but the other countries — in all of which the US has consequent military, intelligence and/or economic interests — surely deserve a mention too. What just happened in Egypt should have taught Washington a lesson about client-patron relationships in a dysfunctional region, but obviously some are slow on the uptake.

[Thanks, Nadia.]

Comments

[mirele]

I heard Hillary Clinton on National Public Radio today explicitly supporting the protests in Iran and wondered where that rhetoric was with Egypt and Tunisia (or, for that matter, now with Algeria, Bahrain or other countries). Of course, it's only stating the obvious that US foreign policy has been to get rid of the current Iranian regime (unfriendly to the USA) while at the same time explicitly or implicitly supporting other undemocratic regimes in the region that are friendly to US interests. And, above all, Israel must be protected. Protests have the potential of destabilizing Iran and possibly making it less likely the country would attack Israel.

There was a time when I naively thought our government would support any democratic movement around the world; those days are long gone.

[Issandr El Amrani]

Actually, I don't that that time ever existed...

[hass]

Hard to tell if the "Green Movement" in Iran is really another "color revolution' cooked up in Washington DC think tanks or not. 4 million Iranians demonstrated on the anniversary of their revolution, and you didn't see THAT in the media or on youtube.

[Bahram]

As an Iranian who is very active into green movement i don't know why some Arabs even democrats think that our movement is "cooked up" by washington. Sorry but when in june 2009 we decided to demonstrate because the cheating in election was so obvious it was spontaneous and without help of western countries. Yes we know that they used our movement for their propaganda but why we have to suffer and being killed by militia because our rulers have anti-western rhetoric. Yes we want secular regime because when you mixed religion and politics it's becoming the worst dictatorship because they don't dare to kill and torture in the name of god. Our guide Khamenei has to much power and he is not elected. Our protest is not against ahmadinejad it's against all not elected people who approve the candidate for different elections (parliamentary and presidential). These people are chosen by the leader who is again not elected. Our president is weak compare to our leader. We want a real democracy without leader and without religion., is it too much ?