Baksheesh

The Arabist has been run by freelance journalists since 2003 as a labor of love. We don't make much from ads, so please contribute to keep this site going.

Search


Your Middle East is a digital newspaper about the Middle East for the web, iPad and iPhone.


Get Arabist contributor Ashraf Khalil's new book!

Social

Subscribe

Get Arabist via email: 

The Arabist Podcast
Sponsored Links

UK City Guides

        Enquira Local 


For low prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets shop ShowTickets.com for your upcoming Las Vegas trip.

Partners

 

Powered by Squarespace
« Off to Brussels | Main | Podhoretz on the NIE »
2:30AM

Links for December 4th

Automatically posted links for December 4th:


Reader Comments (4)

The Har Homa issue is a good model for how the Israeli right has managed to keep getting what they want during a peace process which should ostensibly be bad for them. It was settled to begin with under Netanyahu, ostensibly to keep his right-wing coalition intact. Netanyahu probably intended to kill the peace process all along, but that's beside the point. Once it fell apart, the right was left with their new neighborhood, and in return only assented to implementing some Oslo-related withdrawal that has probably since been undone.

Now comes Olmert, who has coalition partners strongly against discussion of Jerusalem, and in at least one case (Shas) against compromising on Jerusalem in a final agreement. In his case, I'm starting to think he does want to see an agreement, but again, it probably doesn't matter. He makes the commitment on a WB settlement freeze, but goes ahead in Har Homa, which Israel doesn't consider part of the WB, and which everyone in Israel will understand as supporting Jerusalem's Israeli status, as it's the main Jewish block cutting J-lem off from Bethlehem. I suspect coalition politics is again in play; confirmation would come based on whether Israel moves against outposts which are considered illegal even under Israeli law.

Dec 5, 2007 at 3:20 PM | Unregistered CommenterBrian Ulrich

If memory serves me right Olmert was a notoriously anti-partition mayor of Jerusalem who contributed much to that city's forced judaification. He seems to me about as likely as to endorse a real peace deal as Lieberman. Coalition politics is just the cover, an excuse: I don't believe any member of this government has any real desire for a working peace deal.

Dec 5, 2007 at 3:31 PM | Unregistered Commenterarabist

Unless he, like Sharon, has determined that the likely alternative to a peace deal in the near future is a Palestinian turn toward a one-state solution. Still, you're right that this government isn't ideal for the situation, especially with Barak leading its supposed left-wing party.

Lieberman, interestingly enough, has said he'd be willing to accept the idea of Arab neighborhoods in Jerusalem becoming part of a Palestinian state if it came down to it.

Dec 5, 2007 at 5:04 PM | Unregistered CommenterBrian Ulrich

It seems like Abbas and Olmert are both leaders without much power.

Dec 5, 2007 at 8:36 PM | Unregistered Commenterjose

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>