Baksheesh

The Arabist has been run by freelance journalists since 2003 as a labor of love. We don't make much from ads, so please contribute to keep this site going.

Search
Subscribe

Get Arabist via email: 


Your Middle East is a digital newspaper about the Middle East for the web, iPad and iPhone.


Get Arabist contributor Ashraf Khalil's new book!

Social

The Arabist Podcast
Sponsored Links

UK City Guides        Enquira Local


For low prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets shop ShowTickets.com for your upcoming Las Vegas trip.


Graduation Dresses


The UK Web Directory Can Give You What You Need


Connecting global buyers with China suppliers — 
Made-in-China.com 


Sourcing Quality Products from Qualified Manufacturers — ECVV.com

Partners

 

Powered by Squarespace
« How to pass your exams in Egypt | Main | Demonstrators call for release of detainees »
Wednesday
Jun282006

Who stands behind torture in Egypt?

The Muslim Brothers’ website ran a feature on torture in Egypt, which included allegations that “torture machines� are imported from Western countries.

Reader Comments (3)

Aida Seif El-Dalwa has made similar remarks to me during research trips to Cairo. To this effect, she said that the instruments that are used in the turtore process were imported or paid for by US aid.....I cant verfiy but there might be something there.

Jun 28, 2006 at 10:18 AM | Unregistered CommenterMohamed

I don't suppose there's any way of checking the public record on this, as military aid/deals are hush-hush?

Jun 28, 2006 at 4:11 PM | Unregistered CommenterSP

Regardless of the rights and wrongs of this trade if Egypt could not import such instruments, I'm sure they would manufacture them. I don't think this is a case where supply creates demand. I'm also fairly certain that should the Muslim Brotherhood and their ilk come to power, they would prove no different, and probably worse, in this regard, than most other regimes in the Middle East. As regards this trade being paid for by US aid, this point only makes sense if what is meant is that aid is provided on condition that, amongst other things, instruments of torture are purchased from US companies. Goverments do not generally keep their receipts from various sources in different accounts to be used for different purposes, despite what they might sometimes claim. Nevertheless, the argument that if we don't do it, others will, is not a good one. However, many of the specific items mentioned, items to restrain and to disperse crowds are hardly likely to be covered by a definition of torture. Violent individuals need at times to be restrained and violent mobs dispersed. Real physical or psychological torture is inflicted without the use of sophisticated instruments. Where human life is cheap, instruments of torture are not likely to be expensive.

Jun 29, 2006 at 12:45 AM | Unregistered CommenterKevin

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>