Baksheesh

The Arabist has been run by freelance journalists since 2003 as a labor of love. We don't make much from ads, so please contribute to keep this site going.

Search


Your Middle East is a digital newspaper about the Middle East for the web, iPad and iPhone.


Get Arabist contributor Ashraf Khalil's new book!

Social

Subscribe

Get Arabist via email: 

The Arabist Podcast
Sponsored Links

UK City Guides

        Enquira Local 


For low prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets shop ShowTickets.com for your upcoming Las Vegas trip.

Partners

 

Powered by Squarespace
« HRW Press Release on the Referendum Violence | Main | My Referendum Experience »
9:58PM

Referendum Results In

Tonight, it has been reported by the BBC that yesterday's referendum passed with 83-percent of the votes being "Yes."

According to the Egyptian state 16.4 million of the 32 million (54-percent) eligible voters turned out nation-wide.

UPDATE:

Reuters is reporting that the initial electoral returns from the first two provinces showed that referendum was approved by 98-percent.

Hence, it was the remaining 24 governateswhere all the "NO" votes came from - yeah right!

ALSO:

I had brunch with the scholar this morning. We were talking about the turnout and the 83-percent YES margin. Both of us felt it was manipulated to lower it. After all, as the scholar put it, that would mean "around 3 million people turned up to vote 'NO'." Actually, it would have been 2.77 million people voting NO.

Based on the empirical finding we collected, this seems impossible. That said, however, we were in Cairo and not outside, where the government claims the polls were more active.

But who are those 2.77 million naughty citizens voting no?

Al-Masri al-Youm spoke with one voter who said no to changing the constitution. Why?

Well, according to this guy, he did not want to change the system because he wants Hosni Mubarak and only Hosni Mubarak forever.

He did his part by trying to make sure there won't be any democratic slips in Masr. After all, you never know what happens when you open-up the system.

Reader Comments (5)

I saw a statistic in some paper that said the turnout for Upper Egypt was around 70%, that is notably higher than the national average of 54%. We should remember two things: 1) people in rural districts are probably more likely to vote, with the referendum being something of an event in village/small town life and local politics being less driven by ideology; 2) since there were many more lagaan (voting stations) than judges, there was considerably more opportunity for fraud at small stations than in the main ones. It would be interesting to tally the vote and see what proportion came from main stations and sub-stations.

As for wanting Hosni forever, I spoke to a pro-Mubarak demonstrator the other day and asked him who he would like after Mubarak. He said, "Hosni Mubarak. I want him forever and there will be no one else than him." When I pointed out that he was old and would not live forever, he would not consider the possibility.

May 27, 2005 at 4:32 PM | Unregistered CommenterIssandr El Amrani

I am actually one of those who voted No. But I tend to agree with the scholar, and find it very hard to believe that we were 2.7million.

May 27, 2005 at 5:34 PM | Unregistered CommenterMohamed

"As for wanting Hosni forever, I spoke to a pro-Mubarak demonstrator the other day and asked him who he would like after Mubarak. He said, “Hosni Mubarak. I want him forever and there will be no one else than him.� When I pointed out that he was old and would not live forever, he would not consider the possibility."

Are these people sincere?

May 27, 2005 at 10:32 PM | Unregistered Commenterpraktike

A friend of mine spoke to a judge who was overlooking a voting station in Gharbeia, and he was saying that the many farmers/peasants that were coming to vote were thinking that they were coming to vote Yes to Mubarak (not the referundum).

May 28, 2005 at 12:02 AM | Unregistered CommenterMohamed

Praktike: The guy I spoke to was a local NDP official, a small-time guy. I'm sure he's gotten a lot out being active in the party, and knows his interests lie with it. In that sense, I think he was sincerely towing the party line, and reluctant to comment on the succession issue since that is a taboo issue to discuss even at high levels of the party

May 28, 2005 at 6:30 PM | Unregistered CommenterIssandr El Amrani

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>