11:42AM
Sussman on Sharon's plans
Issandr El Amrani
The second MERIP article I want to link to (here is my post about the first) is by Gary Sussman, a professor at Tel Aviv University. In this important article, Sussman articulates what I've always thought about Sharon's withdrawal plan from Gaza: that it's a sham designed, as Dov Weiglass famously said, to put the peace process "in formaldehyde" and encourage the idea that a Palestinian state already exists in Jordan.
The argument is quite complex and detailed, so it is worth reading the entire article.
The article is illustrated by a recent map [PDF, 1.6MB] of Israel and the occupied territories that speaks a thousand words.
In the long term, the Israeli premier hopes that the Palestinian state will meld with Jordan. His assumption is that unilateral disengagement from Gaza and parts of the West Bank, his plan for a carefully managed transition away from direct Israeli rule over the majority of the Palestinians, will set this process in motion. Over time, Sharon calculates, contiguity between “Palestine” and its neighbor to the east, as well as increased trade, cultural ties and the “democratization” championed by the Bush administration, will induce Palestinians on both the West and East Banks of the Jordan to agitate for Palestinian-Jordanian federation themselves. If one assumes that Sharon has quietly held on to his once openly expressed belief that “Jordan is Palestine,” his break with his old supporters among the settler movements and the right becomes easier to understand.
The argument is quite complex and detailed, so it is worth reading the entire article.
The article is illustrated by a recent map [PDF, 1.6MB] of Israel and the occupied territories that speaks a thousand words.
Reader Comments (7)
I remember seeing a map of the West Bank water resources overlaid with the wall/fence/barrier. Anybody know where that could be?
Wow. That's the most depressing thing I've read in a long time. I hope it's not true.
Why is this idea so depressing? The Palestinians will be ruling themselves, without an "occupation" in an entity significantly larger than they are hoping for now. The only difference would be the name - Jordan. If the Palestinians really want a state, and not simply the destruction of Israel, this would seem to be a good solution.
Because they're getting shafted?
They're not gettign shafted. They're getting a bigger state.
Oddly enough, a PLO official (I believe he had been the Min of Info) had proposed a confereration idea once in an article he published in the Village Voice. As I recall, he mentioned the canton system of Switzerland and then compared his concept to the Benelux countries. It sounded like an interesting idea he had in mind. But, sadly, his collegues killed him shortly after his article appeared in the Voice. So much for creative solutions.
Henry Siegman, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (yes, he's my boss, no, this isn't a plug) wrote a similar article for NY Review of Books a little while ago. http://www.cfr.org/pub7496/henry_siegman/sharon_and_the_future_of_palestine.php" rel="nofollow">here